“Agreement.” Merriam-Webster.com Thesaurus, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/agreement. Accessed November 27, 2020. Britannica.com: Encyclopedia article on the agreement What made you look for the agreement? Please let us know where you read or heard it (including the quote if possible). To make a deal or end an argument with someone to reach an agreement on an issue on which people had different opinions, to get a win/deal/deal, etc. agree safely or completely, reach an agreement, reach an agreement, reach an agreement, agree to enter into something like an agreement or agreement by which both parties receive a benefit or advantage to which they can agree to be part of an official Nglish agreement or contract: translation of the agreement for Spanish speakers, to achieve something after discussing or thinking about it for a long time. make concessions to reach an agreement (fr)[ClasseHyper.] speech act – concord, concordance, harmony – grammatical relation – descriptive linguistics[Hyper.] 1. Achieve harmony of opinion, feeling or goal “None of my colleagues would agree on who to elect as president” okay, okay, move forward, hang on, engage – grammar, syntax [field]. . . .
Under a retirement agreement, the Federal Reserve (Fed) buys U.S. Treasury bonds, securities from U.S. authorities or adrox mortgage securities from a prime broker who agrees to buy them back generally within one to seven days. a reverse deposit is the opposite. Therefore, the Fed describes these transactions from the counterparty`s perspective and not from its own perspective. The short answer is yes – but there is considerable disagreement about the magnitude of the factor. Banks and their lobbyists tend to say that regulations were a more important cause of the problems than the policymakers who enlisted the new rules after the 2007-2009 global financial crisis. The intent of the rules was to ensure that banks had enough capital and liquid funds that could be sold quickly in case they got into trouble. These rules may have led banks to keep reserves instead of lending them in the repo market in exchange for government bonds.
For the party who sells the security and agrees to buy it back in the future, this is a deposit; For the party at the other end of the transaction that buys the security and agrees to sell in the future, this is a reverse support agreement. These are simple terms, it is a loan secured by underlying securities that have value in the market. The buyer of a repurchase agreement is the lender and the seller of the repurchase agreement is the borrower. The seller of the repurchase agreement must pay interest, called the repurchase rate, at the time of redemption of the securities. A reverse reverse reverse repo is a reverse repo transaction from the lender`s point of view. Therefore, for the lender of the money, the repurchase agreement is called a reverse repurchase agreement. To explain in more detail, in the example above, Bank B initiates a reverse reverse repo transaction while lending the money. Manhattan College. “Consumer Agreements and the Law: How Legislative Changes Fueled the Housing Bubble,” page 3. Accessed August 14, 2020.
A sell/buyback is the cash sale and a term buyback of a security. These are two different direct transactions in the spot market, one for futures processing. The futures price is set in relation to the spot price to obtain a market return. The basic motivation for sales/buyouts is usually the same as for a classic repo (i.e. The attempt to benefit from the lower financing rates generally available for secured loans as opposed to unsecured loans). .
In the context of political violence during the unrest, the agreement committed participants to “exclusively democratic and peaceful means of settling disputes over political issues.” This had two aspects: some commentators referred to the agreement as “Sunningdale for slow learners”, suggesting that it was nothing more than what was offered in the 1973 Sunningdale Agreement.  This claim has been criticized by political scientists such as Richard Wilford and Stefan Wolff. The first said that “he.. significant differences between them [Sunningdale and Belfast], both in terms of the content and circumstances of their negotiations, implementation and functioning`.  Northern Ireland is concerned about whether the UK will comply with the Northern Ireland Protocol, which guarantees the free movement of goods across the border. Beyond benevolent neglect, the Trump administration has actively encouraged extremists in Britain who want a no-deal exit from the European Union – whatever the cost to Northern Ireland. When this committee held a hearing on Brexit almost two years ago, my Brookings colleague Tom Wright described the government`s approach as “a predatory policy aimed at immediately exploiting economically the distortions and vulnerabilities created for the UK by the Brexit process”. 24 The administration has doubled down on this approach. President Donald Trump called Brexit a “big thing.” 25 He encouraged the United Kingdom to abandon divorce negotiations with the EU26, which he considers an “enemy”27 in favour of a trade agreement with the United States. Former National Security Adviser John Bolton announced during a visit to London in August that he and Trump were “Leavers before there were Leavers.” 28 Vice President Mike Pence, who stood with Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar in Dublin in early September, was lip service to the peace process before calling on Ireland and the EU to “negotiate in good faith with the British government” and “reach an agreement that respects the sovereignty of the United Kingdom.” 29 In addition to the number of signatories[Note 1], Stefan Wolff notes the following similarities and differences between the issues addressed in the two agreements: The agreement provided for the establishment of an independent commission to examine police regimes in Northern Ireland “including ways to promote broad Community support” for these agreements. The UK government has also committed to undertaking a “comprehensive review” of the criminal justice system in Northern Ireland.
10. When Article 73.3556 was adopted in 1992, the Commission highlighted certain advantages arising from the reduction of a certain degree of duplication of programming. In particular, the Commission found that some duplication could save local broadcasters resources invested in the production of expensive programmes. By setting the limit on programme duplication at 25% of the total number of hours of a broadcaster`s average weekly programme, the Commission sought to strike the right balance between the ability of broadcasters to reuse expensive programmes and the increased promotion of competition and diversity of programmes in the local market. Do the benefits that the Commission has previously identified in the context of dual programming still exist in the current market? Given the changes that have taken place over the past twenty-seven years, as we have seen above, allowing the duplication of 25% of the total number of hours of a station`s average weekly program continues to strike the right balance? If we were to maintain and change the rule, the number of programs that could be duplicated on shared channels would have to be increased or decreased, and if so, what would that reasonable percentage be? Commentators should justify any proposed changes in the authorized duplication of programs and explain the benefits they believe would benefit radio stations and their listeners. Furthermore, if the Commission were to amend and maintain the radio reproduction rule, would the restriction on broadcasters` choice of programmes raise concerns about the First Amendment? 21. Necessity and purpose of the proposed rules. This NPRM issues an opinion on whether the Commission should remove or amend the radio duplication rule, which limits the reproduction of programmes with the same services to 25 % of the total number of hours in an average radio week for commercial AM and FM radio stations with contour overlaps of 50 % or more, who are jointly owned or are subject to a time change agreement. The broadcasting industry has undergone significant changes since the Commission adopted the regime in 1992, including a significant increase in the number of licensed radio stations, the introduction of AM programming in the FM band through FM translation stations, improvements in digital radio transmission technology, and new digital methods of distributing audio content across multiple devices. On the basis of these amendments, the NPRM requests an opinion on whether the radio duplication rule has survived its usefulness or whether it is still necessary to promote the public interest objectives of competition, diversity of programmes and frequency efficiency for which it was intended. A Local Marketing Agreement (LRA), also known as a Time Brokerage Agreement (TBC), is the sale of discrete blocks of time by a licensee to a “broker” who provides the programming and one-time commercial announcements to fill that time. 11. Does the trigger for the rule, namely that overlap between stations represents more than 50% of the main area of the community contours of the two stations, remain the appropriate standard if the rule is maintained? Does an overlap in the main contours of the community appropriately identify which stations should be subject to a program duplication rule? Should the percentage of overlap be revised so that the rule applies where there is more or less overlap between common stations? And if so, what should that overlap be? Commenters should justify any proposed changes in the scope of overlap before the program duplication rule is triggered and explain the potential benefits or harms.
For example, would a possible change in the trigger of the rule have different effects on small entities? What impact might increasing or decreasing the contour overlap trigger have on duplicate programming? For example, could changing the overlap trigger lead some communities to do more program duplication, which would affect localism and the availability of various programs? Could changing the rule so that it is triggered by a higher percentage of contour overlap make valuable programming available to a larger number of listeners? 28. . . .
It was discussed that the unique arrangements set out in the Protocol on Northern Ireland under the WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT between the UK and the EU mean that Northern Ireland could get the best of both worlds – duty-free access to the EU`s single market and the UK market. Indeed, Northern Ireland will remain in the customs territory of the United Kingdom, but trade between Northern Ireland and the EU (and therefore the Republic of Ireland) will be subject to the Eu Customs Code without customs duties or other restrictions. Northern Ireland will continue to be part of the EU`s single market for agriculture and industrial products. On 23 January 2020, the UK Parliament approved the draft agreement by passing the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020. Following the signing of the Agreement, the United Kingdom Government adopted a Decision on 29. January 2020, Britain`s ratification document issued and tabled.   The agreement was ratified by the Council of the European Union on 30 January 2020 after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament on 29 January 2020. The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union entered into force on 31 January 2020 at 11 .m GMT, and on that date the Withdrawal Agreement under Article 185 entered into force. However, as customs expert Anna Jerzewska explains, the problem does not completely disappear because of the rules of origin. “What we believe at the moment is that the political effort is going into the free trade agreement, and that is why neither side wants to give flexibility to Northern Ireland because it can be seen as leverage,” he said. The EU wants to avoid cross-border smuggling and tax evasion incentives for cross-border trade and therefore does not want VAT rates in NI to be lower than those of return on investment – and there are currently some.
(The standard VAT rate in return on investment is 23%, compared to 20% in the UK; it is 9% for newspapers currently ranked zero in the UK.) An increase in existing VAT rates in NI would be politically controversial and could therefore be avoided. .
The court applied the doctrine of unilateral error, which allows for a reform of a contract if the party seeking a reform can prove by clear and convincing evidence that it was wrong and that the other party was aware of the error but remained silent. The applicant must prove that there has been a certain prior contractual agreement that contradicts the terms of the written agreement. Id. at *13. As with all legal documents, the devil is in the details when it comes to important considerations that an investor must take before accepting a stunt. In particular, while the structure of the waterfall is easy to spot, a much more nuanced approach is taken when it comes to defining metrics. By way of illustration, “return on invested capital” can be defined as the total capital contributed, the capital contributed to the investments made, or as the total capital contributed to the investments, capital expenditures and operating costs, each definition having a significant impact on the result of the calculation. Please contact Parker McCay`s corporate department to discuss specific considerations to take before accepting a cascading determination. Cascading provisions can often be contentious issues for unions, especially in situations where a default has occurred and the credit transaction involves hedging agreements. This case is a salutary reminder of the importance of clearly agreeing and documenting where payments related to such hedging agreements rank before or in the event of early termination in the payment cascade. Although the English Court has moved from a literal interpretative approach to a more contextual or focused approach to contract interpretation in recent years, the parties should be aware that the starting point for construction is probably still the literal approach. The court found that the developer`s in-house counsel was aware of the flaw and knew she was in favor of the developer, but did not tell the investor`s lawyer anything about it.
The executive investor in charge of the transaction reviewed the deal, but did not notice the error and signed the deal. The error. Unfortunately, when preparing LLC`s written agreement for the third transaction, the return of the capital sale was mistakenly placed after the first paragraph. This is a much better deal for the developer, who would get the first part of his subsidy before the parties get their capital back. Thus, the proponent could receive its funding even if the overall agreement was a loss and did not repay any of the invested capital of the parties. This written agreement was approved and signed by the parties, although this was not what they had negotiated. Having entered into its own hedging arrangements to manage its exposure to swaps, BLB attempted to argue that the “hedging costs” in clause 9.7(a) would include its costs and expenses for restructuring or rebalancing those swap agreements in the event of early termination of borrowers` hedging arrangements. BLB also argued that under the penultimate sentence of clause 9.7, the repayment of those costs and expenses would prevail over the principal and interest due to lenders under the Facility Agreement. At the time of entering into this Agreement, no defect has occurred or will continue under any marketing, administrative or other material agreement with the Borrower and any insurance company (collectively, the “Material Agreements”) that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect or materially affect the value of the track commissions (as defined in the Cascade Collection Agreement). .
In the absence of one or more elements of a valid contract in an oral contract, it is likely that a court will annul the agreement and it will not be enforceable. Many States have rules for certain treaties that must be written, which considers that oral agreements are insufficient. Imagine that the listing agent made the oral offer to the seller and the seller said ok just to find out that the buyer has disappeared. Think they`re happy? (4) an agreement authorizing or employing a broker, broker or other person to buy or sell real estate or lease real property for a period of more than one year or to procure, import or find a buyer or seller of real estate or a lessee or lessor of real estate where the lease is for more than one year; for compensation or commission. Most oral contracts are legally binding. There are, however, some exceptions, depending on the design of the contract and the subject matter of the contract. In many cases, it is best to establish a written agreement to avoid litigation. For an oral agreement to be binding, the elements of a contract in force must be present. To illustrate how the elements of a contract create binding terms in an oral agreement, we use the example of a man who borrows $200 from his aunt to replace a flat tire. Who would want to waste their time? No one. Especially in today`s world. This is why the submission of written offers is an important element of real estate activity.
No.An oral agreement must be reduced in writing and signed by the buyer and seller to take effect. As a contract has never been drawn up or signed, there is nothing to impose on the buyer. While oral contract negotiation may be a faster way to reach an agreement, oral agreements for the sale of real estate are not applicable. If two or more parties reach an agreement without written documentation, they draw up an oral agreement (formally called an oral contract). However, the authority of these oral agreements may constitute a certain grey area for those who are not familiar with contract law. Of course, the real estate market had improved significantly during this period, so the brother could benefit significantly at no cost if he could distribute his sister and then sell the property with a considerable profit. With the significant increase in real estate values in the San Francisco Bay Area, we have seen a measurable increase in disputes between investors, partners and tenants, including friends and family members, because their agreements are oral or if they have been misformed without the advice of a lawyer. To the surprise of many California citizens, oral or oral contracts may be fully enforceable in this state in many circumstances. California`s Civil Code explicitly prohibits certain contracts from being oral – they must be in writing. However, with the exception indicated below, an oral contract may be applied in that State.
. . .
There is no fiduciary, quasi-fiduciary or other special relationship between you and FSB regarding your checking account. Account Terms and Conditions Applicable Law Your account and this agreement are governed by federal laws and regulations applicable to federal federations such as FSBs and, to the extent local law applies, by the laws of the State of Texas. This means, among other things, that your deposit rights and obligations, as explained in this Agreement, are based on Texas federal and banking laws, including fees, charges, disclosures, and communications that may apply from time to time. You agree that, except in this Agreement, all deposit transactions between you and FSB are final and entered into only if recorded in FSB`s records, at its headquarters in San Antonio, Texas. . . .
Figure 3.4 Trade between China and Nigeria, 2000-2010 afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/china_1950_foreign_policy.htm Meanwhile, Nigeria`s trade deficit with China remains huge. While China publicly paints an image of equality, it continues to dominate relations with Nigeria, as I observed in a 2015 paper with Bukola Ajayi. We see this in unbalanced trade, Nigeria`s growing dependence on China and China`s growing importance in Africa. We have also drawn attention to the problem of falsified, falsified and poor quality medicines and other products imported from China to Nigeria. In July 2020, a secret loan agreement was signed between the two countries, with a clause that “the borrower (Nigeria) irrevocably contains any immunity for sovereign or other reasons for himself or his property in arbitration proceedings under Article 8(5), with the enforcement of an arbitral award under it, with the exception of military and diplomatic means. This clause sparked outrage in Nigeria, turning China into a new full-fledged colonizer of Nigeria by buying its sovereignty. After this exclusive agreement, China invested $6.6 billion in Nigeria.   Given the sensitivity of the topic, it is not surprising that the conversation has been highly politicized in several African countries. However, not all arguments are based on facts. In particular, a healthy debate on the benefits of China`s proposed treaties should avoid confusion due to a misunderstanding between the legal provisions contained in these agreements.
China`s needs also correspond to those of a collective Africa. It has not gone unnoticed that parts of the intra-African trade infrastructure are so bad that some African countries sell more products to the EU than to their neighbours. With the infrastructure built in China, AfCTFA will increase Africa`s production capacity and Africa has and will continue to have a large working population, although organizational and management capacities remain in high demand. AfCTFA will launch a transfer of agricultural labor, which currently accounts for 50 percent of the continent`s labor force, to industry, which is currently five times more productive in GDP but has no labor. Some nations will suffer in the short term to get through this transition. February 10, 2011 marks the 40th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Nigeria. The frequent high-level visits of the two sides have established mutual political trust, exchanges and cooperation in the fields of economy, culture, science, education and health, etc. have been very fruitful. . .
Common short expressions: 1-400, 401-800, 801-1200, More. Search results: 259. Exactly: 259. Elapsed time: 174 ms. . . . . . .